Currently there may be errors shown on top of a page, because of a missing Wiki update (PHP version and extension DPL3). |
Topics | Help • Register • News • History • How to • Sequences statistics • Template prototypes |
Difference between revisions of "M12"
(restored) |
(link corrected) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Lucas had bypassed [[M9]], [[M10]], and [[M11]]. The casual observer might wonder how and why this happened. Lucas was following a sequence (see [[Double Mersenne number]]). The first possible Mersenne prime <math>(2^{1}-1=2)</math>, when placed back in the formula <math>(2^{2}-1=7)</math> also produces a prime. When this value is tested <math>(2^{7}-1=127)</math>, another prime is produced. So, Lucas was testing to see if this trend held. | Lucas had bypassed [[M9]], [[M10]], and [[M11]]. The casual observer might wonder how and why this happened. Lucas was following a sequence (see [[Double Mersenne number]]). The first possible Mersenne prime <math>(2^{1}-1=2)</math>, when placed back in the formula <math>(2^{2}-1=7)</math> also produces a prime. When this value is tested <math>(2^{7}-1=127)</math>, another prime is produced. So, Lucas was testing to see if this trend held. | ||
− | There have been efforts to again test this trend. With a number so large <math>2^{(2^{127}-1)}-1 = 2^{170141183460469231731687303715884105727}-1</math>, there is no hope of running a [[primality test]] on this number '''anytime''' in the foreseeable future. (It would take about 4,700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 [[GHz-days]] to run the [[Lucas-Lehmer test]] on that number. Having the top 250 [[Classes of computers#Supercomputer|supercomputers]] working together at full power on this, it would take '''161,600,000 times as long as the universe has existed'''.) This may be a case of the "[[Strong law of small numbers]]". The only way to be certain, is to find a [[factor]], if one exists. [[Landon Curt Noll]] has [[Trial factoring|trial factored]] this number up to a '''[[k]]''' value of at least 3000000000000 [http://www.garlic.com/~wedgingt/MMPstats.txt], a [[bit level]] over 169.4. The current version of [[Prime95]] cannot handle numbers this large, nor can [[mfaktc]]. | + | There have been efforts to again test this trend. With a number so large <math>2^{(2^{127}-1)}-1 = 2^{170141183460469231731687303715884105727}-1</math>, there is no hope of running a [[primality test]] on this number '''anytime''' in the foreseeable future. (It would take about 4,700,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 [[Computing power#GHz-days|GHz-days]] to run the [[Lucas-Lehmer test]] on that number. Having the top 250 [[Classes of computers#Supercomputer|supercomputers]] working together at full power on this, it would take '''161,600,000 times as long as the universe has existed'''.) This may be a case of the "[[Strong law of small numbers]]". The only way to be certain, is to find a [[factor]], if one exists. [[Landon Curt Noll]] has [[Trial factoring|trial factored]] this number up to a '''[[k]]''' value of at least 3000000000000 [http://www.garlic.com/~wedgingt/MMPstats.txt], a [[bit level]] over 169.4. The current version of [[Prime95]] cannot handle numbers this large, nor can [[mfaktc]]. |
[[Category:Mersenne primes]] | [[Category:Mersenne primes]] |
Revision as of 23:06, 3 February 2019
M12, the 12th known Mersenne prime
Lucas had bypassed M9, M10, and M11. The casual observer might wonder how and why this happened. Lucas was following a sequence (see Double Mersenne number). The first possible Mersenne prime
There have been efforts to again test this trend. With a number so large